Navagear.com header image

Joint Harbor Operations, Part 1

June 26th, 2007 · by Tim Flanagan, Managing Editor

Last week, I toured the US Coast Guard’s brand spankin’ new Joint Harbor Operations Command (JHOC) in Seattle. The JHOC is now the home for Coast Guard Sector Seattle’s Sector Command Center and Vessel Traffic Center. The JHOC is the premiere Coast Guard Command Center for the Pacific Northwest, partnering with the Navy, Washington State Patrol, Customs and Border Protection, various agencies of the Department of Homeland Security, and local first responder agencies. When they say “joint operations”, they mean it!

Puget Sound Vessel Traffic Service logoDuring my visit, I toured two facilities both located in the new JHOC building at Pier 36 in downtown Seattle. First, Chief James Luty showed me the Vessel Traffic Service operations center.

Electronic devices are not permitted within the JHOC, so I couldn’t take pictures. To give you some idea of how things work, though, take a look at this 2004 VTS video produced by the Coast Guard. Think air traffic control, and you’ve got the idea.

The room is dimly lit, and each communications specialist sits at one of five stations. These stations look like typical computer workstations, but with six (or was it eight?) large flat-screen monitors showing charts, radar, vessel plots, live video, and other data. Pretty sophisticated. The physical desk surface features a chart of the area that operator controls, so that in the event of power or system failure, they can track vessels the old way: by sliding physical vessel indicators around on the chart.

Vessel Traffic Service Seattle Traffic AOR map

Seattle Traffic” is active on two VHF channels: Channel 5a covers the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the San Juan Islands, Rosario Strait, Bellingham Bay, and the entrances to Puget Sound, while Channel 14 covers the rest of Puget Sound and the Hood Canal. Between radar, AIS, and live video, specialists are able to keep pretty close tabs on all the large vessels operating in their area of responsibility (AOR). All targets are color coded by type: ferries and government vessels are one color, petroleum-carrying vessels are distinct from regular cargo vessels, and those carrying chemicals get their own color as well.

 

Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound Zones Map

Outside the entrance to the Strait of Juan de Fuca, traffic management is handled by the Canadian Coast Guard’s Tofino Traffic operations center, active on channel 74, while the area from Victoria through Haro Strait north to the Strait of Georgia are handled by Victoria Traffic, on channel 11. Vessel tracking data is exchanged between the two countries’ Vessel Traffic Centers in realtime.

If you’re familiar with the area, you’ll quickly realize that the Canadian AOR includes stretches of US water, and the US AOR includes stretches of Canadian water. As a former communications specialist (in civilian law enforcement), I’m very much aware of the many ways interagency rivalries and jurisdictional territorialism can create confusion and delay. During my visit to the Vessel Trafic Center, I found the cooperative, almost symbiotic relationship between the two agencies (in different countries!) truly astonishing. Take a look at the map, though, and it quickly becomes clear that attempting to manage vessel traffic while strictly observing the Canadian/US border would be problematic, to say the least.

The VTS is intended to manage large vessels that, by virtue of their sheer size, are “restricted in their ability to maneuver”. Recreational vessels are not required to actively participate in VTS. However, it’s a good idea to monitor the appropriate channel for the waters in which you operate. Also, you should be aware of the traffic lanes, and minimize the amount of time spent in them.

I regularly monitor channel 14, for example, and listen for the Washington State Ferries, which check in with Seattle Traffic before they cross Puget Sound; instant traffic report! Also, Chief Luty clarified that if recreational boaters experience genuine maritime safety issues in high traffic areas, such as restricted visibility due to fog or a boat disabled in a traffic lane, they should feel free to call in on the active vessel traffic channel.

Next time, I’ll describe what I learned on the second part of my tour…stay tuned!

Tags: Navigation · New Posts · Safety

8 responses so far ↓

  • Capt. Richard Rodriguez // Jun 26, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    The new Rescue 21 system is amazing too. The CG can put a lat/long on the signal of a hand held - I’ve seen it done.

    BTW, Restricted in Ability to Aaneuver is a category unto itself and relates to vessels buy occupation, not necessarily by size. It relates to the nature of their work, (when engaged in their occupation:) ie, buoy tenders, cable layers, tugs etc. A vessel restricted in ability to maneuver will display a ball-diamond-ball in a vertical line by day and all round, red-white-red lights in vertical line by night.

    Vessels participating in VTS have rights because of their participation. We operate only with International Rules in Puget Sound and adjacent waters. There are no inland rules here in the NW.

    The 72 ColLRegs (international rules) do allow a category for Vessels Constrained by draft, but I’ve never seen vessels with shapes or lights here.

  • Tim Flanagan, Managing Editor // Jun 26, 2007 at 4:51 pm

    Rescue 21 is coming up in Part 2!

    You’re completely correct about the phrase “restricted in their ability to maneuver.” I was using it for effect, in a metaphorical sense. All I meant was that out in the open sea, they aren’t restricted, but in a crowded inshore setting, big ships and tugs towing barges just can’t stop, start, and turn the way small craft can. If they could, there wouldn’t be much need for a Vessel Traffic Service! Thanks for clarifying, though.

  • Joint Harbor Operations, Part 2 | Navagear.com // Jun 27, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    [...] Subscribe to Navagear ← Joint Harbor Operations, Part 1 [...]

  • Warren // Sep 4, 2007 at 6:29 pm

    Just to pick an extremely minor nit, it’s the Strait of Juan de Fuca, not the “Straight”. But you knew that, right?

  • Tim Flanagan, Managing Editor // Sep 4, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    OK, Warren. I suppose you’re going to tell me it’s Haro Strait, Rosario Strait, the Strait of Georgia, and George Strait, too, aren’t you?!? :-) Thanks…of course spell check didn’t catch these errors.

  • New US Maritime Strategy Announcement | Navagear.com // Oct 17, 2007 at 10:42 pm

    [...] Whatever your feelings about U.S. foreign policy, it makes sense for these services to coordinate their efforts, maximizing effectiveness and efficiency, so I’m all for it. I also appreciate the emphasis on humanitarian assistance and on preventing wars in addition to winning wars. All in all, it sounds like a move in the right direction. These are the same things that really impressed me during my recent visit to the Joint Harbor Operations Center. [...]

  • AIS Class B Naysayers, Unite! | Navagear.com // Nov 28, 2007 at 12:53 pm

    [...] be counted on to notice any AIS signals at all. And Coast Guard stations, even those with the new “Rescue 21″ technology package we described back in June, may not be equipped to plot Class B [...]

  • Class B AIS Underway | Navagear.com // Oct 29, 2008 at 11:09 am

    [...] I got a chance to test it underway. I contacted Seattle Traffic on VHF Channel 14, and they could NOT see my AIS signal on their Rescue 21 [...]

Leave a Comment